House Deputy Majority Leader and Tingog party-list Rep. Jude Acidre cautioned foreign diplomats against abusing Filipino hospitality, stating that they could be sent back home or face the full force of the law for any violations committed in the Philippines.
“I think it’s only reasonable that people who abuse our hospitality and abuse the privileges that are accorded in goodwill should also be sent home,” Acidre, chairman of the House Committee on Overseas Workers Affairs, said at a news conference.
Acidre’s statement was in response to Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla’s directive for the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to conduct an investigation into alleged illegal activities involving foreign diplomats within the country.
While the Department of Justice (DOJ) refrained from naming diplomats from specific countries in its statement, it noted reports regarding the Chinese embassy’s release of alleged transcripts and recordings of a conversation purportedly involving the Ayungin Shoal.
Acidre supported Remulla’s statement that while foreign diplomats enjoy privileges and immunities, it is equally their responsibility to respect the laws and regulations of the host country.
“To make it simple, diplomats are guests of our country. While they have their own privileges and immunity, it still boils down to the reality that they are guests of the receiving country,” Acidre pointed out.
As regards the specific situation involving the Chinese diplomat, Acidre expressed his concern over potential illegal activities.
“Wiretapping is illegal in the country,” he noted. “If it can be established that this Chinese diplomat has wiretapped or made a recording of phone conversations and leaked these documents, then they must be held accountable under our laws.”
In the same press conference, 1-Rider Partylist Rep. Rodge Gutierrez expressed full support for the NBI probe, saying the agency has jurisdiction in investigating alleged crimes perpetrated within the country.
Echoing Remulla’s remarks, Gutierrez pointed out that diplomatic immunity is not absolute.
“Upon acceptance by the host country, it comes with conditions. Even then, for any reason whatsoever, there are still penalties that the executive branch can impose,” he said.
Gutierrez also raised questions about the legitimacy of the alleged wiretapped conversation.
“If it might have been even a personal conversation, if it is even true, then it might possibly not be covered by diplomatic immunity,” he said.
