“The central theme is the dual nature of the Church as both a sanctuary and a place of mission, mirroring the tension in Christian identity between what is known and what is yet to be discovered”
The second meditation Dominican priest Timothy Radcliffe delivered during the retreat that preceded the Synod for Synodality is titled “Finding Our Place in God and God’s Presence Within Us.”
Father Radcliffe expresses the idea that “God has chosen to reside within us, embracing all our imperfections indefinitely.”
He affirms that God’s presence endures in our Church, even in the face of misconduct and wrongdoing. He concludes by emphasizing our reliance on the Church, acknowledging its current imperfections, while also recognizing its vital role in providing us with the boundless, Spirit-infused environment of our forthcoming home.
In this address, Radcliffe reflects on the idea of the Church as a home and the tensions that arise from differing interpretations of what that home represents.
He emphasizes the need to balance the aspects of a familiar, traditional Church and an inclusive, open Church.
The central theme is the dual nature of the Church as both a sanctuary and a place of mission, mirroring the tension in Christian identity between what is known and what is yet to be discovered.
Radcliffe highlights that every culture has its own concept of home, drawing from various examples such as Asia’s humility when crossing a threshold, Oceania’s boat imagery, and Africa’s vision of the Church as a diverse family.
These images collectively convey the idea that home should be a place of acceptance and challenge, where individuals are affirmed but also encouraged to grow in their faith.
The talk delves into the current crisis of homelessness in the world, both physical and spiritual, with millions of migrants seeking refuge, people experiencing isolation, and the breakdown of traditional family structures.
He connects the need for a renewed Church as a common home to address these global challenges.
The story of the Transfiguration is used as a reference point to discuss the idea of home within the Church.
Jesus invites his closest disciples to witness his divine glory on the mountain, representing a deeply intimate and familiar moment. However, they are called down from the mountain to Jerusalem, a place of mission and ultimate belonging in the Kingdom.
In Radcliffe’s view, the tension in the Church today arises from differing views of what constitutes a home within it.
Some view it as a repository of ancient traditions and devotions that define their Christian identity, while others see it as exclusive and in need of renewal to include marginalized groups.
The debate between those advocating for clear boundaries and those pushing for an open and welcoming Church further underscores this tension.
He underscores that Christian identity is a blend of what is known and what is yet to be revealed.
This paradox is essential for maintaining a healthy balance between a defined tradition and an evolving faith.
The concept of God making a home within us and us seeking a home in God is explored.
The faith’s universal and personal dimensions are recognized, and an appeal is made to broaden our understanding to accommodate diverse perspectives.
The importance of cherished traditions and devotions is acknowledged, but the need to consider those who do not yet feel at home in the Church, such as women, non-Western individuals, and the marginalized, is also highlighted.
The Church is seen as a place where the center and the margins converge.
Finally, the issue of sexual abuse within the Church is addressed.
The scandal has driven many away, but Radcliffe suggests that the Church’s ambiguity—its capacity to both reveal and conceal God—makes it a complex but necessary home.
The call to remain despite the scandal is underlined, as God remains with us even in the midst of the Church’s shortcomings.
Let me add however that sexual abuse inflicts profound harm by profoundly invalidating the survivor’s sense of self-worth.
Those who have endured such abuse often grapple with the overwhelming feeling that their thoughts, desires, and emotions are inconsequential.
They’ve been objectified for the sole purpose of fulfilling the perpetrator’s sexual desires, causing a severe erosion of their dignity and humanity.
Adding to this distress, survivors of sexual abuse frequently bear an undeserved burden of responsibility for the abuse itself.
This burden is particularly burdensome for those who suffered abuse during childhood, as they are especially susceptible to experiencing intense, enduring feelings of shame and guilt.
They may obsessively question why they were singled out for such a traumatic experience, compounding their sense of self-blame and responsibility.
This internalized guilt is often exacerbated by the fact that the perpetrators seldom acknowledge any culpability for the abuse or the resulting harm.
These perpetrators rarely recognize that their actions exploited the survivor’s extreme vulnerability, often exacerbated by the perpetrator’s authority or trust within the relationship.
Its prevalence poses challenging inquiries regarding the extent to which the church has progressed in its endeavors to ensure that members of the hierarchy who have either committed or ignored crimes against children or vulnerable adults are held responsible.
Website: tonylavina.com. Facebook: tonylavs Twitter: tonylavs
