This is now the new moniker attached to lawyer Larry Gadon, the chief complainant in the impeachment case against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
The moniker was coined by a group of concerned citizens who also want to disbar Gadon for statements and actions befitting a “madman” and not a lawyer.
The group filed the disbarment complaint against Gadon before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) on Friday, April 20, accusing Gadon of “gross misconduct, gross immoral conduct, and violations of the lawyer’s oath.”
The group is composed of Zena Bernardo, Evangeline Hernandez, Nona Andaya-Castillo, Natividad dela Cruz Natividad, Jose Mari Tomines Callueng, Jennifer Aiza Santaolaya, Faith Angelie Catalan, and Mark Vincent Lim, who described themselves as “concerned citizens, activists, community workers, mothers who are disgusted by the actions and words of the respondent.”
“We believe he (Gadon) should be removed from the rolls of the legal profession,” they said.
In particular, the group cited Gadon’s recent behavior in Baguio City, where he cursed and flashed the middle finger at supporters of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, after they booed him. He also called them “bobo (idiots).”
“These statements and actuations appear to be made by a madman unfit to be representing the legal profession,” said the complainants, most of whom witnessed the incident.
In filing the complaint, the group cited two provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility:
Rule 7.03—A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, nor shall he whether in public or private life, behave in a scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession; and
Rule 8.01—A lawyer shall not, in his professional dealings, use language which is abusive, offensive or otherwise improper.
After the House of Representative conducted a hearing on the case, the Office of the Solicitor General filed a quo warranto petition against the Chief Justice.
Taking the cue, Gadon threw his support to the quo warranto petition against Sereno in what several groups—including the IBP—described as an unconstitutional way to remove an impeachable officer.
The group also said that Gadon’s ‘amicus curiae comment’ submitted to the SC on the Sereno petition was “poorly written, spelling and grammar-challenged.”
The comment, however, was expunged by the en banc.
“His continued existence as a member of the legal profession is literally sickening, and figuratively spits at the sacrifices our lawyers had made to raise the level of the profession in the service of those who have nothing in life except a chance at justice,” the complainants said.
“The kind of ignorance of the law, rules and even elementary grammar and spelling has clearly no place in the legal profession,” they added.
The IBP leadership earlier said Gadon’s conduct in Baguio City may be a basis for an ethics and disbarment complaint.
Gadon, however, is unfazed.
“I don’t care if I’m disbarred as long as Sereno is removed.”
Gadon faces a similar disbarment complaint over hateful remarks against Muslims, which the group also cited in the latest complaint against the lawyer.
